Development of an immune-nutritional prognostic index in patients with muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer candidates for radical cystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Muscle-infiltrating bladder tumor (MIBT) has a recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 50% at 5 years. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has increased it by 8%, which group of patients benefits the most from this treatment remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prognostic value of immune-nutritional status in patients with MIBT who are candidates for cystectomy, and to develop a score that allows identifying patients with a worse prognosis (pT3-4 and/or pN0-1). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 284 patients with MIBT treated with radical cystectomy. Preoperative laboratory tests were analyzed and immune-nutritional indices were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the PFS. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant relationship with leukocyte/lymphocyte index (p = 0.0001), neutrophil/lymphocyte index (p = 0.02), prognostic nutritional index (p = 0.002), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, the leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002) and PNI (p = 0.04) behaved as independent prognostic factors of decreased RFS. Based on these, a prognostic score was developed to classify patients into 3 prognostic groups. Eighty percent of patients with pT3-4 and/or pN0-1 tumors were in the intermediate-poor prognostic groups. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a precystectomy immune-nutritional score in clinical practice would help in the selection of a group of patients with a more unfavorable pathologic stage and worse PFS. We believe that these patients could benefit more from a NACT.

Extracción renal en donante cadáver: revisión sistemática de la técnica quirúrgica / Deceased donor kidney procurement: systematic review of the surgical technique

Introducción El proceso de extracción renal debe ser una técnica estandarizada con el fin de optimizar las unidades renales para su posterior implante. Objetivos Revisión de la literatura disponible sobre el proceso de extracción renal. Material y métodos Revisión narrativa de la evidencia disponible sobre la técnica de extracción renal en paciente cadáver tras una búsqueda de los manuscritos relevantes indexados en PubMed, EMBASE y SciELO escritos en español e inglés. Resultados La extracción renal en paciente cadáver se divide en dos grupos, tras muerte encefálica (donation after brain death [DBD]) y tras muerte cardiaca (donation after circulatory death [DCD]). La extracción renal en DBD suele acompañarse de la extracción de otros órganos abdominales y/o torácicos, lo que requiere coordinación quirúrgica multidisciplinar. Durante el proceso de extracción debe asegurarse que los pedículos vasculares renales se mantienen íntegros para su posterior implante y disminuir el tiempo de isquemia. Conclusiones La ejecución adecuada y el perfecto conocimiento de la técnica quirúrgica de extracción y de la anatomía, permite disminuir el índice de pérdidas de injertos relacionados con una incorrecta extracción (AU)

Introduction Kidney procurement procedure must be carried out following a standardized technique in order to optimize kidney grafts for their subsequent implantation. Objectives Review of the available literatura on kidney procurement procedure. Material and methods Narrative review of the available evidence on deceased donor kidney procurement technique after a search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo written in English and Spanish. Result Deceased donor kidney procurement can be divided into two groups, donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD). Kidney procurement in DBD frequently includes other chest and/or abdominal organs, requiring multidisciplinary surgical coordination. During the harvesting procedure, the renal vascular pedicle must remain intact for subsequent implantation and reduced ischemia time. Conclusions Adequate execution and perfect knowledge of the technique for surgical removal and anatomy reduces the rate of graft losses associated to inadequate harvesting techniques (AU)

Deceased donor kidney procurement: Systematic review of the surgical technique.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney procurement procedure must be carried out following a standardized technique in order to optimize kidney grafts for their subsequent implantation. OBJECTIVES: Review of the available literature on kidney procurement procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Narrative review of the available evidence on deceased donor kidney procurement technique after a search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo written in English and Spanish. RESULTS: Deceased donor kidney procurement can be divided into two groups, donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD). Kidney procurement in DBD frequently includes other chest and/or abdominal organs, requiring multidisciplinary surgical coordination. During the harvesting procedure, the renal vascular pedicle must remain intact for subsequent implantation and reduced ischemia time. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate execution and perfect knowledge of the technique for surgical removal and anatomy reduces the rate of graft losses associated to inadequate harvesting techniques.

Carcinomatosis peritoneal tras nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica en carcinoma de células renales: nuestra experiencia y revisión de la literatura / Peritoneal carcinomatosis after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Our experience and literature review

Objetivo: La carcinomatosis peritoneal asociada al carcinoma de células renales es una entidad infrecuente, normalmente asociada a grandes masas renales, siendo muy rara su presentación tras la cirugía de tumores renales localizados. Nuestro objetivo es revisar la literatura y analizar los factores implicados en el desarrollo de carcinomatosis peritoneal tras nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica en tumores localizados.Material y métodos: Presentamos nuestra experiencia con 2 casos de carcinomatosis peritoneal tras cirugía parcial laparoscópica. Realizamos revisión de la literatura y analizamos los factores asociados al desarrollo de carcinomatosis peritoneal tras cirugía parcial laparoscópica en carcinoma de células renales.Resultados: Entre 2005-2018 en nuestro servicio fueron sometidos a nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica 225 pacientes por neoplasia renal localizada. Dos pacientes desarrollaron carcinomatosis peritoneal en el seguimiento, uno al año y medio de la cirugía y un segundo caso a los 7 años. Pocos casos de carcinomatosis peritoneal tras cirugías de neoplasia renal han sido descritos en la literatura, estando más frecuentemente asociados a grandes masas renales, con múltiples metástasis al diagnóstico, siendo el pronóstico infausto. Entre los factores implicados en su desarrollo pueden estar la diseminación de células tumorales durante la cirugía, la extensión tumoral directa o la metástasis por vía hematógena.Conclusiones: La carcinomatosis peritoneal tras nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica constituye un evento muy raro, pero que debe ser tenido en cuenta y, dado que es el único factor en el que podemos influir, extremar al máximo las precauciones durante el acto quirúrgico, siguiendo los principios oncológicos. (AU)

Objective: Peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with renal cell carcinoma is an infrequent entity, usually associated with large renal masses, and with a very rare presentation after surgery of localized renal tumors. Our objective is to review the literature and analyze the factors involved in the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in localized tumors.Material and methods: We present our experience with two cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We reviewed the literature and analyzed the factors associated with the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial surgery in renal cell carcinoma.Results: Between 2005-2018, 225 patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal neoplasia in our service. Two patients developed peritoneal carcinomatosis during follow-up, at 1.5 and 7 years after surgery. Few cases of postoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis for renal neoplasia have been described in the literature, being more frequently associated with large renal masses, with multiple metastases at diagnosis, with a poor prognosis. The dissemination of tumor cells during surgery, direct tumor extension or metastasis by hematogenous route, are among the factors involved in the development of this condition.Conclusions: Peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy constitutes a very rare event. However, it should be taken into consideration, and, since it is the only factor we can influence, we must maximize precautions during the surgical act, following oncological principles. (AU)

Peritoneal carcinomatosis after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Our experience and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with renal cell carcinoma is an infrequent entity, usually associated with large renal masses, and with a very rare presentation after surgery of localized renal tumors. Our objective is to review the literature and analyze the factors involved in the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in localized tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present our experience with two cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We reviewed the literature and analyzed the factors associated with the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial surgery in renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Between 2005-2018, 225 patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal neoplasia in our service. Two patients developed peritoneal carcinomatosis during follow-up, at 1.5 and 7 years after surgery. Few cases of postoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis for renal neoplasia have been described in the literature, being more frequently associated with large renal masses, with multiple metastases at diagnosis, with a poor prognosis. The dissemination of tumor cells during surgery, direct tumor extension or metastasis by hematogenous route, are among the factors involved in the development of this condition. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy constitutes a very rare event. However, it should be taken into consideration, and, since it is the only factor we can influence, we must maximize precautions during the surgical act, following oncological principles.

Nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica en tumores renales cT1. Análisis comparativo de complicaciones y supervivencia / Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in cT1 renal tumors. Comparative analysis of complications and survival

Introducción y objetivos: Análisis comparativo de complicaciones postoperatorias y supervivencia entre nefrectomía parcial (NP) y radical (NR) laparoscópica en cáncer de células renales (CCR) cT1.Material y método: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes birrenos con tumor renal único cT1 tratados en nuestro centro entre los años 2005 y 2018 mediante NP o NR laparoscópica.Resultados: Cumplieron los criterios de inclusión para el estudio 372 pacientes. Fueron tratados mediante NR 156 (41,9%) y 216 (58,1%) mediante NP. En 10 (4,6%) NP y 6 (3,9%) NR hubo complicaciones Clavien Dindo III-V (p = 0,75). El índice de comorbilidad de Charlson (ICC) se identificó como variable predictora independiente de complicaciones (p = 0,02), no influyendo el tipo de cirugía en el análisis multivariante. La estimación de la supervivencia global (SG) fue de 81,2 y de 56,8% a los 5 y 10 años en el grupo de NR y de 90,2 y 75,7% en el grupo de NP, respectivamente (p = 0,0001). Se identificaron como factores predictores de mortalidad global la obesidad (HR 2,77, p = 0,01), el ICC ≥ 3 (HR 3,69, p = 0,001) y el FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta (HR 1,87,p = 0,03). El tipo de nefrectomía no demostró influencia en la SG. La estimación de la supervivencia libre de recidiva (SLR) fue de 86,1% a los 5 y 10 años en el grupo de NR y de 93,5 y 83,6% en el grupo de NP respectivamente (p = 0,22).Conclusiones: La NP laparoscópica no es inferior a la NR en términos de seguridad oncológica y quirúrgica en el CCR cT1. El tipo de nefrectomía no influyó en la SG del paciente, sin embargo, sí se comportaron como factores predictores la obesidad, el índice Charlson ≥ 3 y el FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Comparative analysis of postoperative complications and survival between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Material and method: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys and single renal tumor cT1 treated in our center between 2005 and 2018 by laparoscopic PN or RN.Results: 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. RN was performed in 156 (41.9%) patients and PN in 216 (58.1%). Clavien Dindo III-V complications were observed in 10 (4,6%) PN and 6 (3,9%) RN patients (p = 0.75). The comorbidity Charlson index (CCI) was identified as an independent predictor variable of complications (p = 0.02) and surgical approach did not affect multivariate analysis. Estimated overall survival (OS) was 81.2% and 56.8% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 90.2% and 75.7% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.0001). Obesity (HR 2.77, p = 0.01), CCI ≥ 3 (HR 3.69, p = 0.001) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge (HR 1.87, p = 0.03) were identified as predictors of overall mortality. Nephrectomy approach showed no influence on OS. Estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 86.1% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 93.5% and 83.6% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.22).Conclusions: Laparoscopic PN is not inferior to RN in terms of oncologic and surgical safety in cT1 RCC. Nephrectomy approach did not influence patient OS, however, obesity, CCI ≥ 3 and GFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge did behave as predictors (AU)

Influence of double J stent in the complications of ureterovesical anastomosis during kidney transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Complications arising from ureterovesical anastomosis in kidney transplantation have an important influence on the success of the procedure. The most serious and frequent complications are fistula and stenosis of the ureterovesical junction. The placement of double J stents in anastomosis is currently recommended to reduce these complications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether the placement of a DJ stent affects complications of anastomosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 697 patients treated with cadaveric donor renal transplant in our center from 1999 to 2018 was performed. Results were compared according to double J stent placement and the surgical technique employed for anastomosis. RESULTS: Transplantation was performed without DJ placement in 51.7% of the patients, compared to 48.3% who were treated with DJ stent placement. The most commonly used technique was Lich-Gregoir. Ureterovesical fistula occurred in 5% of cases, and ureterovesical stenosis in 4.2%. DJ stent behaved as a protective factor for ureterovesical fistula but did not significantly influence the development of stenosis. The Taguchi technique greatly increased the risk of developing both ureterovesical fistula and stenosis. The incidence of stenosis and fistula was significantly higher when the Taguchi technique was combined with no DJ stent placement. CONCLUSION: DJ stent placement acts as a protective factor for ureterovesical stenosis complications. The results of our study seem to agree with current literature.

Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in cT1 renal tumors. Comparative analysis of complications and survival.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Comparative analysis of postoperative complications and survival between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys and single renal tumor cT1 treated in our center between 2005 and 2018 by laparoscopic PN or RN. RESULTS: 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. RN was performed in 156 (41.9%) patients and PN in 216 (58.1%). Clavien Dindo III-V complications were observed in 10 (4,6%) PN and 6 (3,9%) RN patients (p = 0.75). The comorbidity Charlson index (CCI) was identified as an independent predictor variable of complications (p = 0.02) and surgical approach did not affect multivariate analysis. Estimated overall survival (OS) was 81.2% and 56.8% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 90.2% and 75.7% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.0001). Obesity (HR 2.77, p = 0.01), CCI ≥ 3 (HR 3.69, p = 0.001) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge (HR 1.87, p = 0.03) were identified as predictors of overall mortality. Nephrectomy approach showed no influence on OS. Estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 86.1% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 93.5% and 83.6% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic PN is not inferior to RN in terms of oncologic and surgical safety in cT1 RCC. Nephrectomy approach did not influence patient OS, however, obesity, CCI ≥ 3 and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge did behave as predictors.

Influencia del catéter doble J en las complicaciones de la anastomosis vesicoureteral realizada durante el trasplante renal / Influence of double J stent in the complications of ureterovesical anastomosis during kidney transplantation

Introducción: Las complicaciones surgidas de la anastomosis vesicoureteral en el trasplante renal influyen de forma importante en el éxito del trasplante; siendo las más graves y frecuentes la fístula y la estenosis de la unión ureterovesical. Actualmente se recomienda la colocación de catéteres doble J en esta anastomosis para reducir estas complicaciones.Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio es evaluar si la colocación de un CDJ influye en las complicaciones de esta anastomosis.Material y métodosSe ha realizado un análisis retrospectivo de 697 pacientes tratados con trasplante renal de donante cadáver en nuestro centro desde 1999 hasta 2018; y se ha comparado los resultados en función del uso o no de catéter doble J y la técnica quirúrgica realizada en la anastomosis.Resultados: En el 51,7% de los pacientes no se colocó CDJ; frente a un 48,3% en los que sí se colocó. La técnica más utilizada fue Lich-Gregoir. Se produjo fístula ureterovesical en un 5% de casos, y estenosis ureterovesical en un 4,2%. El CDJ se comportó como factor protector de fístula ureterovesical, pero no influyó significativamente en el desarrollo de estenosis. La técnica de Taguchi multiplicó el riesgo de desarrollar tanto fístula como estenosis ureterovesical. La incidencia de estenosis y de fístula fue significativamente mayor al combinar la técnica de Taguchi con la ausencia de catéter.Conclusión: El CDJ actúa como factor protector para las complicaciones de la estenosis ureterovesical. Los resultados de nuestro estudio parecen ir en concordancia con la literatura actual. (AU)

Introduction: Complications arising from ureterovesical anastomosis in kidney transplantation have an important influence on the success of the procedure. The most serious and frequent complications are fistula and stenosis of the ureterovesical junction. The placement of double J stents in anastomosis is currently recommended to reduce these complications.Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether the placement of a DJ stent affects complications of anastomosis.Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of 697 patients treated with cadaveric donor renal transplant in our center from 1999 to 2018 was performed. Results were compared according to double J stent placement and the surgical technique employed for anastomosis.Results: Transplantation was performed without DJ placement in 51.7% of the patients, compared to 48.3% who were treated with DJ stent placement. The most commonly used technique was Lich-Gregoir. Ureterovesical fistula occurred in 5% of cases, and ureterovesical stenosis in 4.2%. DJ stent behaved as a protective factor for ureterovesical fistula but did not significantly influence the development of stenosis. The Taguchi technique greatly increased the risk of developing both ureterovesical fistula and stenosis. The incidence of stenosis and fistula was significantly higher when the Taguchi technique was combined with no DJ stent placement.Conclusion: DJ stent placement acts as a protective factor for ureterovesical stenosis complications. The results of our study seem to agree with current literature. (AU)

Evolución de la función renal en pacientes con cáncer renal cT1 después de nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica. Factores predictores de deterioro de función renal / Evolution of renal function in patients with cT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment

Introducción y objetivos Analizar la evolución de la función renal tras nefrectomía parcial (NP) y radical (NR) laparoscópica e identificar factores predictores de deterioro de función renal.Material y método Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes birrenos con filtrado glomerular (FG) > 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 y tumor renal único cT1 tratados en nuestro centro entre los años 2005 y 2018.Resultados 372 pacientes cumplieron los criterios de inclusión para el estudio. 156 (41,9%) fueron tratados mediante NR y 216 (58,1%) mediante NP. Al alta hubo una diferencia de 26,75 mL/min/1,73 m2 de FG entre NR y NP. La edad > 60 años, las complicaciones postoperatorias (OR 2,97, p = 0,005) y NR (OR 10,03, p = 0,0001) fueron factores predictores de FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta. Únicamente la NR (OR 7,69, p = 0,0001) se comportó como factor pronóstico independiente de FG<45 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta. La mediana de seguimiento de la serie fue de 57 (IQR 28 - 100) meses. Al final del seguimiento, nueve (6%) pacientes tratados con NR desarrollaron enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) grave y tres (2%) insuficiencia renal terminal (IRT). Edad > 70 años, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2,12, p = 0,001), hipertensión arterial (HTA) (HR 1,73, p = 0,01) y NR (HR 2,88, p = 0,0001) se comportaron como factores predictores independientes de FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2. Para un FG<45 mL/min/1,73 m2 fueron edad > 70 años, DM (HR 1,99 IC 95% 1,04 a 3,83, p = 0,04) y NR (HR 5,88 IC 95% 2,57 a 13,45, p = 0,0001).Conclusiones La NR es un factor de riesgo a corto y largo plazo de ERC, aunque con baja probabilidad de ERC grave o IRT en pacientes con FG > 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 preoperatoria. La edad, DM e HTA contribuyen al empeoramiento de la función renal durante el seguimiento (AU)

Introduction and objectives To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for deterioration in kidney function.Material and method Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018.Results A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated by RN and 216 (58.1%) by PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age > 60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR<45 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age > 70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001).Conclusions RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD, although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up (AU)

Evolution of renal function in patients with cT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for renal function impairment. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated with RN and 216 (58.1%) with PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age >60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age >70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up.

Utilidad de la embolización vascular prequirúrgica de tumores renales con trombo tumoral en la vena renal izquierda / Utility of preoperative vascular embolization of renal tumors with left renal vein tumor thrombus

Introducción y objetivos: La embolización prequirúrgica de la arteria renal (EPAR) puede emplearse en grandes masas renales antes de la nefrectomía para simplificar el procedimiento y disminuir el sangrado intraoperatorio. Nuestro objetivo es determinar el papel de la EPAR sobre el sangrado intraoperatorio y las complicaciones postoperatorias en los tumores renales izquierdos con trombo tumoral limitado a la vena renal izquierda (nivel-0).Material y métodosAnálisis retrospectivo de 46 pacientes intervenidos de nefrectomía radical izquierda y trombectomía como tratamiento de un carcinoma de células renales asociado a trombo tumoral de nivel 0 durante el periodo 1990-2020. La EPAR se limitó a aquellos casos en los que el acceso quirúrgico a la arteria renal principal se encontraba a priori dificultado en el estudio de imagen prequirúrgico (n=9; 19,6%). El sangrado intraoperatorio se estimó en base a la tasa de transfusión perioperatoria, y las complicaciones postoperatorias se categorizaron según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo. Para el contraste de variables se utilizó el test Chi-cuadrado. Se realizó un análisis multivariable para identificar los predictores de transfusión y complicaciones.ResultadosNo existieron diferencias significativas en la tasa de complicaciones global (11,1 vs. 32,4%; p=0,19), complicaciones graves (0 vs. 8,1%; p=0,51), o tasa de transfusión (11,1 vs. 19%; p=0,49) entre ambos grupos (EPAR vs. no-EPAR). En el análisis multivariable la EPAR no se comportó como un predictor de complicaciones (OR: 0,11; IC95% 0,01-2,86; p=0,18) ni de transfusión (OR: 0.46; IC95% 0,02-7,38; p=0,58). (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Preoperative renal artery embolization (PRAE) for large renal masses may be performed prior to nephrectomy in order to simplify the procedure and reduce intraoperative bleeding. The objective of this work is to determine the role of PRAE on intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications in left renal tumors with tumor thrombus limited to the left renal vein (level 0).Material and methodsRetrospective analysis to evaluate 46 patients who underwent left radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with level 0 tumor thrombus during the period 1990-2020. PRAE was limited to those cases in which surgical access to the main renal artery was presumed a priori difficult in the preoperative imaging study (n=9; 19.6%). Intraoperative bleeding was estimated based on the perioperative transfusion rate, and postoperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The Chi-squared test was used for comparisons. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of transfusion and complications.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the overall complication rate (11.1% vs. 32.4%, P=.19), major complication rate (0% vs.8.1%, P=.51), or transfusion rate (11.1% vs. 19%, P=.49) between both groups (PRAE vs. non-PRAE). In the multivariate analysis, PRAE did not behave as a predictor of complications (OR:0.11, 95%CI 0.01-2.86; P=.18) nor transfusion (OR:0.46, 95%CI 0.02-7.38;P=.58). (AU)

Utility of preoperative vascular embolization of renal tumors with left renal vein tumor thrombus.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative renal artery embolization (PRAE) for large renal masses may be performed prior to nephrectomy in order to simplify the procedure and reduce intraoperative bleeding. The objective of this work is to determine the role of PRAE on intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications in left renal tumors with tumor thrombus limited to the left renal vein (level 0). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis to evaluate 46 patients who underwent left radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with level 0 tumor thrombus during the period 1990-2020. PRAE was limited to those cases in which surgical access to the main renal artery was presumed a priori difficult in the preoperative imaging study (n = 9; 19.6%). Intraoperative bleeding was estimated based on the perioperative transfusion rate, and postoperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The Chi-squared test was used for comparisons. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of transfusion and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the overall complication rate (11.1% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.19), major complication rate (0% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.51), or transfusion rate (11.1% vs. 19%, p = 0.49) between both groups (PRAE vs. non-PRAE). In the multivariate analysis, PRAE did not behave as a predictor of complications (OR: 0.11, 95%CI 0.01-2.86; p = 0.18) nor transfusion (OR: 0.46, 95%CI 0.02-7.38; p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: In our study on left RCC with level 0 tumor thrombus and difficult access to the main renal artery, PRAE was not associated with increased bleeding or postoperative complications, and it did not behave as an independent predictor of these variables. Therefore, it could be used as a preoperative maneuver to facilitate vascular management in selected cases.

Control de la vena cava inferior retrohepática por acceso anterior en el carcinoma de células renales con trombo tumoral nivel iiia: descripción paso a paso / Retrohepatic inferior vena cava control through an anterior approach in cases of renal cell carcinoma with level iiia tumor thrombus: Step-by-step description

Objetivo: Evaluar la seguridad y eficacia de la técnica de control de la vena cava inferior retrohepática por acceso anterior (RIVCA, por retrohepatic inferior vena cava control through an anterior approach) en el carcinoma de células renales (CCR) con trombo tumoral nivel iiia.Pacientes y métodosSerie inicial de 6 casos que presentan CCR con trombo tumoral nivel iiia intervenidos de nefrectomía radical y trombectomía tumoral mediante la técnica RIVCA entre 2018-2019. El objetivo de la técnica RIVCA es obtener un control completo de la vena cava inferior retrohepática por encima de la porción craneal del trombo tumoral, pero excluyendo las venas hepáticas mayores con el fin de preservar la circulación hepatocava natural. Se proporciona la descripción paso a paso del procedimiento. Se registraron prospectivamente los rasgos de la enfermedad, así como las características y los resultados quirúrgicos.ResultadosLa nefrectomía radical y la trombectomía tumoral se completaron en todos los casos. La técnica RIVCA no aumentó significativamente el tiempo quirúrgico (rango: 14-22min). La media de sangrado estimado fue de 325cc (rango: 250-400). No se requirió transfusión de sangre intraoperatoria en ningún caso. La media de unidades de concentrados de hematíes transfundidos por paciente en el período postoperatorio fue de 1,3 (rango: 0-2). No hubo casos de embolia pulmonar intraoperatoria ni se produjeron complicaciones mayores (Clavien-Dindo III-V) en el período postoperatorio a 30 días. La estancia hospitalaria postoperatoria (mediana) fue de 8 días (rango: 5-11). (AU)

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava control through an anterior approach (RIVCA) technique in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with level iiia tumor thrombus.Patients and methodsInitial series of 6 cases presenting RCC and level iiia tumor thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy using the RIVCA technique between 2018-2019. RIVCA technique aims to gain complete control of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava above the cranial end of the tumor thrombus, but excluding the major hepatic veins in order to preserve the natural hepato-caval shunt. A step-by-step description of the procedure is provided. Disease features, operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were registered prospectively.ResultsRadical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy were completed in all cases. RIVCA technique did not increase operative time significantly (range: 14-22min). Mean estimated blood loss was 325cc (range: 250-400). Blood transfusion was not required intraoperatively in any of the cases. Mean postoperative transfusion rate was 1.3 red blood cells packed units (range: 0-2). There were no cases of intraoperative pulmonary embolism or major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V) in the period of 30 days postoperatively. Median postoperative length of stay was 8 days (range: 5-11). (AU)

Retrohepatic inferior vena cava control through an anterior approach in cases of renal cell carcinoma with level IIIa tumor thrombus: Step-by-step description.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava control through an anterior approach (RIVCA) technique in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with level IIIa tumor thrombus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Initial series of 6 cases presenting RCC and level IIIa tumor thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy using the RIVCA technique between 2018-2019. RIVCA technique aims to gain complete control of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava above the cranial end of the tumor thrombus, but excluding the major hepatic veins in order to preserve the natural hepato-caval shunt. A step-by-step description of the procedure is provided. Disease features, operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were registered prospectively. RESULTS: Radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy were completed in all cases. RIVCA technique did not increase operative time significantly (range: 14-22 min). Mean estimated blood loss was 325 cc (range: 250-400). Blood transfusion was not required intraoperatively in any of the cases. Mean postoperative transfusion rate was 1.3 red blood cells packed units (range: 0-2). There were no cases of intraoperative pulmonary embolism or major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V) in the period of 30 days postoperatively. Median postoperative length of stay was 8 days (range: 5-11). CONCLUSIONS: The RIVCA technique applied to cases of RCC and level IIIa tumor thrombus provides complete control of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava above the tumor thrombus cranial end, while prevents intraoperative hemodynamic instability by maintaining cardiac preload through the porto-caval shunt. This technique may limit operative morbidity (intraoperative pulmonary embolism and massive hemorrhage), thus becoming a helpful adjunct to be used in cases of RCC with level IIIa tumor thrombus.

Manejo quirúrgico de tumores en riñón en herradura. Revisión de la literatura y análisis de 2 casos / Surgical management of horseshoe kidney tumors. Literature review and analysis of two cases

Introducción: El riñón en herradura es una anomalía congénita poco frecuente en la población general que combina ectopia renal, malrotación y alteraciones en la vascularización. El tumor que más frecuentemente se desarrolla en estos casos es el carcinoma de células renales (50%).Una de sus características a destacar es la gran variabilidad en su anatomía, sobre todo a nivel vascular.Material y métodosPresentamos 2 casos de pacientes con diagnóstico de tumor renal en riñones en herradura, ambos tratados con nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica, llevados a cabo en nuestro servicio; y realizamos una revisión de la literatura actual.DiscusiónLas indicaciones de tratamiento quirúrgico en tumores en esta enfermedad son las mismas que en los riñones anatómicamente normales. Tradicionalmente, el tratamiento ha sido la cirugía abierta, siendo la heminefrectomía la cirugía de elección. En la actualidad se tiende a defender la cirugía conservadora de nefronas, y el abordaje laparoscópico ha adquirido más importancia progresivamente.ConclusiónEs fundamental realizar un estudio de imagen minucioso para una correcta planificación quirúrgica. (AU)

Introduction: The horseshoe kidney is a rare congenital anomaly in the general population that combines renal ectopia, malrotation and abnormal vascular supply. The most frequently developed tumor in this case is renal cell carcinoma (50%).One of its main characteristics is great anatomical variation, especially in terms of vascular structures.Material and methodsWe present two cases of patients with diagnosis of renal tumor in horseshoe kidneys, both treated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in our department. Additionally, we have carried a review of the current literature.DiscussionIndications for surgical treatment in this pathology are the same as in kidneys with normal anatomy. Traditionally, treatment has been open surgery, with heminephrectomy as surgery of choice. The current trend is to advocate nephron-sparing surgery, and the laparoscopic approach has been progressively gaining importance.ConclusionA thorough imaging study is essential for proper surgical planning. (AU)

Retrohepatic inferior vena cava control through an anterior approach in cases of renal cell carcinoma with level iiia tumor thrombus: Step-by-step description. / Control de la vena cava inferior retrohepática por acceso anterior en el carcinoma de células renales con trombo tumoral nivel iiia: descripción paso a paso.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava control through an anterior approach (RIVCA) technique in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with level iiia tumor thrombus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Initial series of 6 cases presenting RCC and level iiia tumor thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy using the RIVCA technique between 2018-2019. RIVCA technique aims to gain complete control of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava above the cranial end of the tumor thrombus, but excluding the major hepatic veins in order to preserve the natural hepato-caval shunt. A step-by-step description of the procedure is provided. Disease features, operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were registered prospectively. RESULTS: Radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy were completed in all cases. RIVCA technique did not increase operative time significantly (range: 14-22min). Mean estimated blood loss was 325cc (range: 250-400). Blood transfusion was not required intraoperatively in any of the cases. Mean postoperative transfusion rate was 1.3 red blood cells packed units (range: 0-2). There were no cases of intraoperative pulmonary embolism or major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V) in the period of 30 days postoperatively. Median postoperative length of stay was 8 days (range: 5-11). CONCLUSIONS: The RIVCA technique applied to cases of RCC and level iiia tumor thrombus provides complete control of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava above the tumor thrombus cranial end, while prevents intraoperative hemodynamic instability by maintaining cardiac preload through the porto-caval shunt. This technique may limit operative morbidity (intraoperative pulmonary embolism and massive hemorrhage), thus becoming a helpful adjunct to be used in cases of RCC with level iiia tumor thrombus.

Evolution of renal function in patients with CT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment. / Evolución de la función renal en pacientes con cáncer renal cT1 después de nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica. Factores predictores de deterioro de función renal.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for deterioration in kidney function. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated by RN and 216 (58.1%) by PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age > 60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age > 70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD, although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up.

Surgical management of horseshoe kidney tumors. Literature review and analysis of two cases.

INTRODUCTION: The horseshoe kidney is a rare congenital anomaly in the general population that combines renal ectopia, malrotation and abnormal vascular supply. The most frequently developed tumor in this case is renal cell carcinoma (50%). One of its main characteristics is great anatomical variation, especially in terms of vascular structures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present two cases of patients with diagnosis of renal tumor in horseshoe kidneys, both treated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in our department. Additionally, we have carried a review of the current literature. DISCUSSION: Indications for surgical treatment in this pathology are the same as in kidneys with normal anatomy. Traditionally, treatment has been open surgery, with heminephrectomy as surgery of choice. The current trend is to advocate nephron-sparing surgery, and the laparoscopic approach has been progressively gaining importance. CONCLUSION: A thorough imaging study is essential for proper surgical planning.

Renal artery infectious (mycotic) pseudoaneurysms in renal transplantation recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Infection of the artery at or around the anastomotic site is an ominous complication commonly presenting as a leak and/or local dissolution of the arterial wall. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Narrative review based on relevant PubMed, EMBASE, and Scielo indexed English or Spanish-written articles for the period January 2000-December 2019. A pooled analysis regarding etiology was performed. Based on the results obtained with this approach, a diagnostic/therapeutic algorithm is suggested in order to optimize its clinical management. FINDINGS: Arterial pseudoaneurysms are pseudocapsuled contained hematomas generated as the result of an arterial leaking. They are infrequent (<1% of cases), mostly related with infection (contamination of preservation fluid or sepsis) and located at the arterial anastomotic site in renal transplantation recipients. Although they are frequently diagnosed in symptomatic patients days/weeks after transplantation, they may remain unnoticed for long periods being diagnosed incidentally. Color coded-Doppler ultrasound confirms the clinical suspicion. Angio CT-scan and angiography are used for surgical planning or endovascular treatment, respectively. The etiological diagnosis is made on a basis of excised tissue culture. The decision-making process regarding the treatment approach, mostly relies on clinical presentation and anatomical location. Therapeutic options include ultrasound-guided percutaneous thrombin injection, endovascular treatment, and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mycotic pseudoaneurysms in renal transplantation recipients may pose a significant challenge in cases of spontaneous rupture, given the risk for massive bleeding and death. Adequate management requires accurate diagnosis. Early endovascular stenting remains the treatment of choice in hemodynamically unstable patients. Percutaneous injection and vascular reconstruction present variable success rates in preserving graft function.